Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Harvester Works v. Hally

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 13, 1881PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Action in the district court for Scott county to recover the balance due on a promissory note. On the trial, before Macdonald, J., and a jury, the plaintiff introduced in evidence the instrument set forth in the opinion, and it further appeared from the complaint and undisputed evidence that plaintiff, previously to bringing this action, had taken the machines, mentioned in the instrument from the possession of the defendant, sold them, and applied the proceeds in…

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Scott county to recover the balance due on a promissory note. On the trial, before Macdonald, J., and a jury, the plaintiff introduced in evidence the instrument set forth in the opinion, and it further appeared from the complaint and undisputed evidence that plaintiff, previously to bringing this action, had taken the machines, mentioned in the instrument from the possession of the defendant, sold them, and applied the proceeds in part-payment. The defendant had a verdict, and plaintiff appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This action is brought upon the following instrument :

“$240. Belle Plaine, Minn., October 5, 1878.
“On or before the first day of September, 1879, for value received in two M. L. reapers, I promise to pay, to the order of the Minneapolis Harvester Works, two hundred and forty dollars, at the office of Minneapolis Harvester Works, in Minneapolis, Minn., with interest at the rate of 12 per cent-per annum from date until paid; agreed, that if paid at maturity, (or in thirty days thereafter,) then the interest shall be nothing. And I further agree, in consideration of the credit herein given, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Third National Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Ratchford v. Cayuga County Cold Storage & Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Manson v. DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Russell v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Alden v. Dyer & BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API