Legal Opinion

Arabian v. Kearns

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 1983No. 16-82-10538; CA M-48; 126032; CA M-50PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, J.

This matter is before us on jurisdictional referrals under ORS 46.063. The issue is whether, in an action where an attorney fee may be awarded to the prevailing party by reason of a contract or a statute, the amount of the attorney fee claimed is to be included in determining the amount in controversy for jurisdictional purposes under ORS 46.060.

Historically, if an attorney fee was recoverable as part of a party’s substantive claim, it was aggregated with the rest of the claim for jurisdictional purposes; however, if the attorney fee was recoverable only as part of costs, it was not. Springer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. FryOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Shipler v. Van RadenOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Springer v. Bowen, Lee & Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Ornduff v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Amended July 26, 2016 Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  4. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API