Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 31, 1972No. 24,500PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Duncan, Judge:

*280*279The use of language, from which the trier of the facts can conclude beyond a reasonable doubt amounts to an avowed present determination or intent to injure another presently or in the future, is criminally actionable as being violative of Article 134, Uniform *280Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. United States v Gilluly, 13 USCMA 458, 32 CMR 458 (1963); United States v Sulima, 11 USCMA 630, 29 CMR 446 (1960); United States v Humphrys, 7 USCMA 306, 22 CMR 96 (1956); United States v Holiday, 4 USCMA 454, 16 CMR 28 (1954); United States v Sturmer, 1 USCMA…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. HolidayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. GillulyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. ShropshireUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. HumphrysUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. PeszynskiU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. OrtizU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. WallU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API