Legal Opinion

United States v. Shropshire

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 26, 1971No. 23,394PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Dakden, Judge:

“I have more muscle in my little finger than you have in your whole body and if you take this restraining gear off, I’ll show you what I will do to you.” These words form the basis of one specification of a threat that a special court-martial found the appellant guilty of. Our review is to determine whether the quoted words constitute an offense.

A special court-martial composed of a military judge alone found the appellant guilty of five different specifications alleging failure to obey a lawful order, disrespect to a superior petty officer, communicating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. HolidayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. GillulyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. HumphrysUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  5. United States v. KellyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. WartsbaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. RapertCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  3. United States v. CottonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  5. United States v. DunbarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API