Legal Opinion

State v. Nance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 16, 2010No. AC 30047PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HARPER, J.

The defendant, Willette Nance, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (l). The defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied her motion for a mistrial after the prosecutor referred to inadmissible evidence during his cross-examination of her and (2) improperly instructed the jury with regard to the essential element of intent. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On the basis of the evidence presented at trial, the jury reasonably could have found…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ReidConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Orellana v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Camacho v. Commissioner of Correction.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  4. State v. CiulloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. State v. BellamySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API