State v. Ciullo
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Pasquale E. Ciullo, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered following a jury trial, of three counts of unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95. The defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly instructed the jury on the elements of unlawful restraint, self-defense and the defense of property, and marshaled the evidence in favor of the state; (2) there *396was insufficient evidence to prove that he had committed the crime of unlawful restraint in the first degree; (3) prosecutorial impropriety deprived him…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. LusterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. PlourdeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Hurley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CampbellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. CiulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014