Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Allison v. Daniels, Unpublished Decision (9-20-2002)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2002No. Case No. 01 CA 86Unpublished

1Concurrence

{¶ 63} Allison has provided this court with an inadequate record. Because I disagree with the majority's decision to permit Allison to improperly include Dr. Crum's deposition in the record of this case at this late stage of the proceedings, I must respectfully concur in judgment only. Because Allison failed to provide us with a sufficient record to address his last two assignments of error, we must presume the trial court's challenged rulings were correct, and affirm the decision of the trial court on that basis.

{¶ 64} Allison has provided this court with only a partial transcript of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API