May v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
Petitioners Ronald A. May, Susan E. May, and Gayle Bradford have filed an original action asking this court to declare the popular name and ballot title of Proposed Amendment 3 insufficient and to enjoin Respondent Arkansas Secretary of State Charlie Daniels from placing the measure on the ballot for the November 2, 2004 General Election. The proposed amendment is sponsored by Intervenors Jerry Cox and Chris Stewart, acting individually and on behalf of the Arkansas Marriage Amendment Committee. Our jurisdiction to determine this matter is pursuant to Amendment 7 to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Hoban v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Becker v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Gaines v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Bailey v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Kinchen v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Cox v. DanielsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Richardson v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Cox v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Wilson v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.