Legal Opinion

Arkansas Women's Political Caucus v. Riviere

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1984No. 84-215PublishedCited by 453 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

In this original action the petitioner, the Arkansas Women’s Political Caucus, asks this court to declare invalid proposed Constitutional Amendment No. 65, “The Unborn Child Amendment.’’ We hold that the popular name of the proposed amendment constitutes a partisan coloring of the ballot and declare the measure ineligible for consideration at the November 6, 1984, election.

In two historic cases, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that the Constitution protects a woman’s right to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy and that a state may not unduly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Maher v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Pafford v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by453 opinions

  1. Gaines v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Becker v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

448 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API