Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 2014No. CV-14-753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN R. BAKER, Justice.

liOn September 5, 2014, Petitioners, Brian Richardson and Mary Dillard, acting individually and on behalf of the ballot-question committee Citizens for Local Rights (“Richardson”) filed this original action challenging the timeliness and sufficiency of an initiative petition for a proposed constitutional amendment with the popular name of “The Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Amendment” also known as “Issue No. 4” certified by the Respondent, Mark Martin, in his official capacity as Arkansas Secretary of State, for the November 4, 2014 general-election ballot. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Becker v. RiviereSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Kurrus Ex Rel. Arkansans to Protect Police, Libraries, Education, & Services (APPLES) v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Bradley v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Ferstl v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Brewer v. FergusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Rose v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Stephens v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Stiritz v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  5. Conway v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API