Johnson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge.
Introduction
Stanley Tyrell Johnson (“Movant”) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his Motion to Reopen 29.15 Proceedings Due to Fraud and Abandonment of Counsel Under Rule 29.15. 1 (“Motion”). We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
Background
Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of first-degree burglary and assault, armed criminal action, and violating an order of protection. We affirmed Mov-ant’s judgment of conviction on appeal. State v. Johnson, 148 S.W.3d 873 (Mo.App. E.D.2004).
Movant timely filed a pro-se Rule 29.15 motion to vacate. Thereafter, Movant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Edgington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Walker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hemphill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010