Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2006No. ED 86907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Stanley T. Johnson (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his amended Rule 29.15 1 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daugherty v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. MISRAMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API