Legal Opinion
Walker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2006No. ED 87054PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE W. DRAPER III, Judge.
Santino Walker (hereinafter, “Movant”) appeals from the denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief proceeding. We dismiss this appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Movant’s convictions for first degree murder and armed criminal action and the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion, without an evidentiary hearing, were affirmed by this Court in State v. Walker, 972 S.W.2d 295 (Mo.App. E.D. 1998). On April 4, 2005, Movant filed a pro se “Motion Requesting Sua Sponte Inquiry into Abandonment.” The motion court issued…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- S & J, INC. v. McLoud & Co., LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re Marriage of JeffreyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Russell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. YoungerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Simmons v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Turpin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.