Haase v. Cardoza
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
Appellant brought this action to recover the sum of $10,000 from respondent as a result of an alleged oral promise made by respondent to and with her deceased husband to pay appellant said sum and also to recover the further sum of $3,000, upon an assigned claim, based upon an alleged oral promise made by respondent to and with her deceased husband to pay to Loretta M. Haase the sum of $3,000. At the close of the appellant’s case in chief the trial court granted respondent’s motion for a nonsuit and this appeal followed.
It is stated in Lashley v. Koerber. 26 Cal.2d 83, 84…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Singer v. MarxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rask v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Gregory v. HardyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Leonard v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Haase v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Haase v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.