American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Willard Realty Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
The appellant contended, in the Court of Appeals and before this Court, that the provision in the contract between the parties hereto for the appointment of George M. Kinder as agent of the defendant, “for the receipt of any legal documents including process” required for the enforcement of the contract, was not sufficient to enable the Missouri court to acquire jurisdic tion, so as to render a judgment in personam against the defendant, by the service of summons upon Kinder. The briefs and arguments of the parties in the Court of Appeals and before us were directed to this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Telephonic, Inc. v. RosenblumNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Boyles v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Murray v. Ahlstrom Industrial Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.