Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Boyles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1983No. 671A82PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*489FRYE, Justice.

The question with which we are presented is whether a North Carolina court is bound to accord full faith and credit to a default judgment for alimony arrearages rendered by a Florida court when the defendant in the action did not receive actual notice of the Florida court proceeding and the plaintiffs certified letter to the defendant notifying him of the action was returned to her marked “unclaimed.” We hold that the Florida judgment cannot be accorded full faith and credit because it was not a valid judgment under Florida law: the notice given in the case was inadequate under…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In re T.R.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Moody v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Florida National Bank v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. In re A.P.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  5. White v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API