Legal Opinion

Murray v. Ahlstrom Industrial Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1998No. COA98-152PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant Ahlstrom Industrial Holdings, Inc. (hereinafter “Ahlstrom”) as an instrument and pipe foreman on two separate projects. Plaintiff was initially hired to work at a project located in Calhoun, Tennessee. After the completion of the Calhoun, Tennessee project, plaintiff was laid off and remained unemployed for a period of about two and one-half months. His former supervisor, Brian Rear, telephoned plaintiff át plaintiffs residence in Canton, North Carolina and offered him an identical position (as instrument and pipe general foreman) at a project…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goldman v. Parkland of Dallas, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Thomas v. Overland Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Willard Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Warren v. Dixon and Christopher CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. St. Jude Med., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Washington v. Traffic Markings, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Burley v. U.S. Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. Beal v. Coastal Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Burley v. U.S. Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API