Legal Opinion

Telephonic, Inc. v. Rosenblum

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1975No. 10502PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OMAN, Justice.

This is a suit by a New Mexico corporation, whose principal office is in Albuquerque, against a resident of the State of California. A copy of the summons and complaint were served upon defendant, Rosen-blum, in Santa Clara County, California. The district court quashed the service and dismissed the complaint upon the ground of lack of jurisdiction over the person of Rosenblum. Plaintiff, Telephonic, has appealed. We affirm.

The resolution of the question of in per-sonam jurisdiction over Rosenblum depends entirely upon (1) whether he intentionally agreed to waive his…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Glassman v. HyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HiattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Medicine Shoppe International, Inc. v. J-Pral Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Tarango v. PastranaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Lillie Benally and Grant Benally on Behalf of Norman Benally, an Adult v. Amon Carter Museum of Western ArtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API