Legal Opinion
HOUSING & REDEV. AUTH. OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Schapiro
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 1973No. 44104PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacLaughlin, Justice.
An action was commenced in March 1972 by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of St. Paul to condemn certain property owned by respondents, Peter and Evelyn Nerenberg. Respondents asserted that the petition for condemnation should be denied because, among other things, the taking was not for a public purpose and the Authority acted in bad faith. The trial court found that the taking was for a public purpose and that the Authority had not acted in bad faith. Respondents appeal to this court from the denial of their alternative motion for amended findings of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Minneapolis v. WurteleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- HRA IN AND FOR CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. FroneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'NSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Port Authority of St. Paul v. Rlr, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008