Legal Opinion
Redd v. Rubin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 4, 1998No. Civ.A. 97CV1303 CKKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
In an Amended Complaint, the Plaintiff, Trayon Redd, alleges that the Defendant, Robert Rubin violated the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794 (1994) (“Act”), and that Defendants Armentha Cruise-Mills, and Aspen Temporary Services, Inc., violated the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA), by discriminating against her on the basis of disability, namely obesity. Before the Court is Defendant Rubin’s Motion to Dismiss, or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. Defendant Rubin seeks a dismissal of the case on the grounds…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Elizabeth M. Paroline v. Unisys Corporation Edgar L. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coulibaly v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Bissell v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999