Legal Opinion

Jo Ann Iverson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Carmel Iverson v. Arden Frandsen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1956No. 5385_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Jo Ann Iverson, by her mother and guardian ad litem, brought this action against the appellee, Frandsen, in the District Court of Utah, for certain allegedly libellous statements made in a psychological report on the mental level and capacity of the appellant. Federal jurisdiction is based upon requisite diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy.

At the close of the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the appellee, from which the appellant appeals. The trial court concluded that the report was qualifiedly privileged without any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Glass v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. National Disabled Soldiers' League, Inc. v. HaanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  5. Jones v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. M. F. Patterson Dental Supply Company, Inc. And E. O. Blake v. Cullom S. WadleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  2. Morgan v. MansfieldDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API