Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. A124125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

After serving a term of imprisonment on convictions for attempted assault in the first degree and unlawful use of a weapon, petitioner was released on 36 months’ post-prison supervision. He petitions for judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision imposing special sex offender conditions of post-prison supervision, to be implemented at the discretion of petitioner’s supervising officer. We affirm.

The facts are not disputed. Petitioner committed his crimes in 1999 and was sentenced in 2000. In its order establishing conditions of post-prison supervision, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API