Legal Opinion
Knutson Mortgage Corp. v. Salata
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 23, 1999No. AC 19732PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The defendant Helen Salata1 appeals from the judgment confirming a mortgage foreclosure sale following the denial of her motion to reargue the confirmation. The plaintiff, Knutson Mortgage Corporation, has moved to dismiss the defendant’s appeal as untimely.2 We hold that the filing of a bankruptcy petition by the defendant during the appeal period following the confirmation of the foreclosure sale tolled the appeal period and extended the time for filing her motion to reargue. Therefore, we deny the portion of the plaintiffs motion to dismiss that challenges the timeliness…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Stanley Koolik, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Stanley Markowitz, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. MehtaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,246, Bankr. L. Rep. P 74,295 in the Matter of New York Stock Exchange Arbitration Between Marco Barbier Silvana Barbier and Stefania Barbier, and Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc., Successor-In-Interest to Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. And Roger E. Bendelac, Roger E. BendelacCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Jeisean M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. MamudiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- 62-64 Bank Street, LLC v. AmelioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025