Legal Opinion
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Mehta
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 19, 1995No. 14226PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The named defendant, Rajnikant S. Mehta,1 appeals from a deficiency judgment rendered against him. The sole issue is whether the trial court improperly determined that the plaintiff, Citicorp Mortgage, Inc., timely filed its motion for a deficiency judgment pursuant to General Statutes § 49-14 (a).2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*824The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this appeal. On January 25, 1993, the plaintiff obtained a judgment of strict foreclosure with respect to the defendant’s real estate. The trial court found the debt owed to the plaintiff to be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- In Re Hunters Run Limited Partnership, Debtor. Miner Corporation, and John Hand, Dba/sunny Day Cement Company v. Hunters Run Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- City of Bridgeport v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Provident Bank v. LewittConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Krondes v. O'BoyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Knutson Mortgage Corp. v. SalataConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. MamudiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.