Legal Opinion
In re Jeisean M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 24, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
In this termination of parental rights proceeding, the respondent mother1 has filed a motion for review2 seeking reversal of the decision of a Superior Court judge denying her application for a waiver of fees, costs and expenses to pursue an appeal. We grant the respondent’s motion for review and grant the relief requested therein.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our consideration of the respondent’s motion. The respondent and John Doe3 are the parents of Jeisean, who was bom on December 3, 1999. The child was placed with the department of children…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- M. L. B. v. S. L. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mayer v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roth v. WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tripati v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Tripati v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009