Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. O'Connell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 4, 1925No. 11,217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheafor

Plaintiff in error brought this suit in the county court to recover from defendant for personal property purchased by him at a public sale. Judgment there for defendant, from which an appeal was taken to the district court, where trial was had to the court without a jury. The court found generally for defendant and rendered judgment accordingly. Plaintiff brings the case here and moves for a supersedeas.

On April 29, 1921, one A. D. Daubin executed to the plaintiff bank a chattel mortgage covering certain personal property, a portion of which was purchased by defendant at a public sale held on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Maier v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Clatworthy v. FergusonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Wright v. Colorado Osteopathic Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  5. Moore v. JacobucciSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Alamosa v. HolbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Lamon v. HaradaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Chapell Ice Cream Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API