Maier v. Freeman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
The plaintiff Maier, being indebted in the sum of $2898.90 for sheep purchased by him from one Nellis, and conflicting claims being made upon him for the money by several creditors of Nellis, he instituted this action against said creditors and Nellis to compel them to interplead concerning their several pretensions. This being done, after trial the court entered judgment awarding the fund (which Maier had then paid into court) to certain of the defendants who had summoned Maier as garnishee in the course of actions prosecuted by them, respectively, against Nellis. By such…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Brackett v. . HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Bank of Ukiah v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murray, Dibrell & Co. v. McNealy & CuretonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- White Mountain Bank v. Presbury WestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- McIntyre v. HauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Farmer v. Bank of GraettingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Carr v. BrawleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.