Legal Opinion

Clatworthy v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 6, 1922No. 10,463PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action in interpleader, and the controversy is now only between the defendants, W. H. Clatworthy and Virginia Ferguson, each of whom claims a right, superior to that of the other, to the proceeds of a crop of beets delivered to the plaintiff, The Great Western Sugar Company, by the third defendant, John Engel. The trial court found in favor of Ferguson, and rendered judgment accordingly. Clatworthy brings the cause here for review.

The claim of Clatworthy, plaintiff in error here, is based on an assignment made May 28, 1921, by John Engel, the grower of the beets. Briefly stated,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. SzulereckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Wright v. Colorado Osteopathic Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Moore v. JacobucciSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Whitehead v. JessupColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Flanagan Bank v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  2. D. K. Porter, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Mitchell v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Brug v. HerbstSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. School District No. 3 v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API