Legal Opinion

City of Alamosa v. Holbert

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 5, 1927No. 11,766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheabor

Deeehdaht in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, brought suit against plaintiff in error, herein designated as defendant, or the city, on a written contract for the sinking of an artesian well. Trial to the court without a jury, judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings the case here.

The contract was entered into February 6, 1924, and contained the following, among other provisions:

“Unforeseen difficulties — No claim. — The contractor agrees that he will sustain all losses or damages arising from the action of the elements, the nature of the work to be done under the contract and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boldt v. Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Montrose Land & Investment Co. v. Greeley National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Jones v. BoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Collins v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Davis v. LarsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BensonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ray L. Atchison Construction Co. v. SossamanColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. James v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API