Legal Opinion

Taction Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 20, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00812Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TACTION TECHNOLOGY, INC., Case No.: 21-cv-00812-TWR-JLB 12 Plaintiff, PUBLIC 13 v. [REDACTED] ORDER GRANTING 14 APPLE INC., IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 15 Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL 16 17 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. [ECF No. 209] 18 19 20 Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. 21 (“Defendant”), seeking to compel discovery from Plaintiff Taction Technology, Inc. 22 (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 209.) Specifically, Defendant seeks ten documents Plaintiff 23 clawed back, one…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Barton v. ClancyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API