Legal Opinion
Colvocoresses v. W. S. Wasserman Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 9, 1937No. Action of Assumpsit No. 122PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The plaintiff seeks to recover twelve thousand dollars from the defendant company in an action of assumpsit on a contract executed by the parties to this action on February 11, 1935; and the question raised by the demurrer is whether the first count of the plaintiff’s declaration, as amended, sets out a cause of action against the defendant. A demurrer was sustained by this court to this count on the declaration as originally drawn, but the plaintiff claims that the amended declaration presents a very different question, and that the demurrer…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- La Rosa ex rel. La Rosa v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Joseph Greenspon's Sons Iron & Steel Co. v. Pecos Valley Gas Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931
- Arthur Jordan Piano Co. v. LewisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1930
- Valentine v. ShepherdArizona Supreme Court · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reeder v. Sanford School, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1979
- USH Ventures v. Global Telesystems Group, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2000
- Colvocoresses v. W. S. Wasserman Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1942
- Clauson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961
- Swenson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.