Legal Opinion

Marriage of Langlois v. Langlois

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 5, 1989No. 88-1777PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

Richard Langlois appeals from a trial court order denying his motions to modify child support and to vacate a seek-work order. Richard's sole financial resource is Supplemental Security Income (SSI), received pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. secs. 1381-1383c. The court continued an order allocating 25% of Richard's SSI benefits for child support purposes. We hold that such an order is in derogation of applicable state law and constitutes an abuse of discretion. However, the order that Richard look for work is not forbidden by any state or federal regulation and lies…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Staples Ex Rel. Staples v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  5. In RE MARRIAGE OF BURGER v. BurgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tennessee Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Young v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In re Michael S.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Morris v. MorrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Morris v. MorrisKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API