Legal Opinion

Tennessee Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Young v. Young

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1990PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

OPINION

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits are subject to legal process in the state courts of Tennessee for the payment of court-ordered child support. Because we disagree with the conclusion reached by both the trial judge and the Court of Appeals that applicable federal statutes permit garnishment of such funds, we reverse the judgment entered below.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The parties in this case, Lisa Ann Hayes Young and Johnny Charles Young, were divorced in June 1986. They had one child, a daughter, who was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ely v. ElySupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  4. Ex Parte GriggsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Pyke v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Davis v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Metz v. MetzNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Marrocco v. GiardinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API