Commonwealth Ex Rel. Morris v. Morris
Kentucky Supreme Court
1DissentStephens, Justice
Respectfully, I must dissent. I would affirm the Court of Appeals unanimous decision holding that SSI disability payments may not be considered by a court in making a child support award. The SSI program was created for “the purpose of establishing a national program to provide supplemental security income to individuals who have attained age 65 or are blind or disabled.” 42 U.S.C. § 1381. The goal of this program was “to assist those who cannot work because of age, blindness, or disability.” Schweiker v. Wilson, 450 U.S. 221, 223, 101 S.Ct. 1074, 1077, 67 L.Ed.2d 186 (1981) (quoting S.Rep.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wissner v. WissnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MATTER OF ROSE v. MoodyNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.