Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Gilman

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Report from Nisi Prius. Appeal from the decree for an allowance by the Judge of Probate for the county of Kennebec, to the appellee, widow of the late Nathaniel Gilman. The facts fully appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtAppleton, C. J.

It was determined in Gilman v. Gilman, 52 Maine, 165, after a full hearing of all parties and upon satisfactory proof, that the domicil of the late Nathaniel Gilman was at the time of his death in "Waterville in Kennebec county.

This Court has jurisdiction of the probate of the will of said Gilman, from the fact that his domicil, at the time of his death, was in this State. He deceased, too, in the place in which his domicil was established. The probate of the *185will has been had in the Supreme Court of Probate. As is well remarked by Deoto, C. J., in Petersen v. Chemical Bank, 32 N. Y., 23, —…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of NoahCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hammond v. Temporary Compensation Review BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Jones v. ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  4. In re The Estate of BeauchampOrphan's Court of Delaware · 1938
  5. Bank of Commerce v. BerneroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API