Legal Opinion

Comer v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1924No. Civ. No. 4201PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

Respondent suffered personal injuries and damage to his automobile by running into a broken trolley wire of appellant, while driving in a southerly direction on Vermont Avenue, in the city of Los Angeles. Defendant appeals from the judgment against it, and in doing so relies principally upon alleged error of the trial court in the giving of certain instructions and refusing others asked. It is also claimed that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

It appears that as a street-car had passed under it the trolley wire above the south-bound track became severed at a point some…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rolland v. PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. McKeon v. LissnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Canton Cotton Warehouse Co. v. PoolMississippi Supreme Court · 1900
  4. McDonald v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Brimberry v. Dudfield Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Comer v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Pauly v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Pauly v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API