Legal Opinion
In Re Cargill Meat Solutions Wage & Hour Litigation
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 10, 2008No. 3:CV-06-513PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
WILLIAM J. NEALON, District Judge.
This action is the consolidation of Civil Action Nos. 3:06-cv-00513, 3:06-cv-00532, and 3:06-cv-01420. (3:06-cv-00532, Doc. 34). The three actions alleged that the Defendant, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, (hereinafter “Cargill”) failed, and continues to fail, to compensate workers for time spent donning, doffing, waiting for, gathering, maintaining, and sanitizing work-related clothing, gear, and equipment and for time spent traveling between the changing area and the production line before and after shifts and during break times.…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Franklin v. Kellogg Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Spoerle v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Perrin v. Papa John's International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
- Andrako v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Verderame v. Radioshack Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.