Legal Opinion

Verderame v. Radioshack Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2:13-2539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GOLDBERG, District Judge.

This case involves a putative class action alleging that RadioShack Corporation’s use of the “fluctuating workweek” method for calculating overtime violates the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (“PMWA”), 43 P.S. § 333.101-115. Before me are several motions which directly, address this issue.1 After careful consideration, I conclude that RadioShack’s method of computing overtime violates the PMWA’s requirement that employees be paid overtime “not less than one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate.” 43 P.S. § 333.104(c).

I. Factual Background2

Radi…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chevalier v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Poe v. IESI MD CorporationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Bonds, J. v. GMS Mine RepairSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Chevalier v. General Nutrition Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. IVANOVS v. BAYADA HOME HEALTH CARE, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API