Legal Opinion

Blausey v. Stein

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1980No. 79-471PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The primary term of the lease under consideration expired in 1939. The resolution of this appeal turns upon the meaning of the phrase “found in paying quantities” contained in the habendum clause.

In Murdock-West Co. v. Logan (1904), 69 Ohio St. 514, 520, this court held that the mere existence of oil which is capable of being produced is insufficient to support an extension of the leasehold under this type of lease, unless that oil has, in fact, been produced. The record indicates that appellee extracted oil in the period from 1971 through 1976. We must determine whether this oil was produced…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weisant v. FollettOhio Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Gibson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Paulus v. Beck Energy Corp., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Monroe County2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API