Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dickson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2007No. 7 EAP 2005PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We are asked to consider whether the sentencing enhancement codified at 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, which imposes a mandatory sentence enhancement on a person who visibly possesses a firearm or firearm replica during the commission of a crime of violence,1 applies to an unarmed co-conspirator to the underlying crime where his accomplice brandishes a firearm during the commission of the offense. Before reaching the merits, however, we must determine whether Appellant waived his challenge to § 9712 by failing to raise it first in the trial court. We find that Appellant preserved the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WatleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. PhillipsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API