Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank Fiorillo, Jr., and Art Krueger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1999No. 97-10551, 97-10552PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Per curiam
Frank Fiorillo and Art Krueger appeal their convictions for wire fraud and violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) (42 U.S.C. §§ 6901 et seq.). Fiorillo also appeals his convictions for receiving explosives without a permit. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Diversey Corp. (“Diversey”) is a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of industrial cleaning products. In 1992, Diversey discovered that two of its products, Slurry and Eclipse, would leak out of then-containers in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Mohamed Jawara, Also Known as Haji JawaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Bobby Der Enslin, AKA Bobby De Enslin, Bobby Enslin DCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Lawrence Ezekiel Reid, United States of America v. Wayne BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lsl Biotechnologies Seminis Vegetable Seeds, Inc. Lsl Plantscience LccCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.