Legal Opinion

United States v. Bobby Der Enslin, AKA Bobby De Enslin, Bobby Enslin D

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 24, 2003No. 02-50087PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed January 13, 2003, slip op. 331, and appearing at 315 F.3d 1205, is amended as follows:

1.At slip op. 344 [315 F.3d at 1213], line 4, insert the following footnote after “During their search,”:

The officers had lawful consent to search the entire house to look for a dangerous fugitive for whom they had an arrest warrant. They had not yet completed their search. Thus, the officers were lawfully in the room when they found Enslin. Accordingly, Enslin’s reliance upon Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 110 S.Ct. 1093, 108 L.Ed.2d 276 (1990), is misplaced. Buie held that an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County, California v. RetteleSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Merritt Sharp, III v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. Cherrington v. SkeeterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Rafael RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API