Legal Opinion
Cemex, S.A. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 12, 2003No. Consol. 93-10-00659PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of the Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement and National Cement Company of California (collectively “Ad Hoc”) to enforce the judgment entered in this matter against Plaintiff Cemex, S.A. (“Cemex”), a Mexican exporter of gray portland cement. Ad Hoc represents domestic producers who succeeded in this matter in obtaining increases in the calculation of antidumping duties over the amount originally calculated by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) for the second administrative review period,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sandvik Steel Company v. United States, Fujitsu Ten Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. (Surety for Carreon, Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- International Trading Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cemex, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Koyo Corp. of U.S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Koyo Corp. of U.S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Norsk Hydro Canada Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.