Legal Opinion
Ginsberg v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 2, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the negligence of the defendant or its employees. The action comes here upon an exception of the plaintiff to the allowance of a motion for a directed verdict for the defendant. There was no error.
The evidence in its aspects most favorable to the plaintiff was as follows: The plaintiff on or about September 18, 1951, shortly before 3:30 p.m. boarded a train of the defendant at Scollay station, Boston. This train was bound for Maverick station, East Boston, through the East Boston…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Wilson v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Walker v. Benz Kid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Roscigno v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Wadsworth v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Enrich v. Windmere Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Brady v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Bernstein v. Highland Associates of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
- Mendum v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Stein v. LaveinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.