Legal Opinion

State v. Stallings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1985No. 844SC1323PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The dispositive question presented by this appeal is whether the State presented evidence that defendant was the perpetrator of the armed robbery sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion to dismiss.

I

The law governing questions of the sufficiency of the evidence in criminal cases is well established. See State v. Earnhardt, 307 N.C. 62, 296 S.E. 2d 649 (1982); State v. Bell, 65 N.C. App. 234, 309 S.E. 2d 464 (1983), aff’d, 311 N.C. 299, 316 S.E. 2d 72 (1984) (per curiam). Briefly summarized, the law requires the State in a criminal prosecution to present to the jury substantial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FairclothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. People v. LinscottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. VetteseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Smallwood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API