State v. Stallings
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The dispositive question presented by this appeal is whether the State presented evidence that defendant was the perpetrator of the armed robbery sufficient to withstand defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I
The law governing questions of the sufficiency of the evidence in criminal cases is well established. See State v. Earnhardt, 307 N.C. 62, 296 S.E. 2d 649 (1982); State v. Bell, 65 N.C. App. 234, 309 S.E. 2d 464 (1983), aff’d, 311 N.C. 299, 316 S.E. 2d 72 (1984) (per curiam). Briefly summarized, the law requires the State in a criminal prosecution to present to the jury substantial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. FairclothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- People v. LinscottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- People v. VetteseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Smallwood v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.