Legal Opinion
Whittingham v. Amherst College
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 8, 1995No. Civil Action No. 95-30065 FHFPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF MICHAEL P. WHITTINGHAM’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Docket No. 26)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In the underlying action, Plaintiff Michael P. Whittingham alleges that Defendant Amherst College failed to promote him in the Admissions Office on account of his race and thereafter retaliated against him, all in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Massachusetts Civil Rights statutes. Now, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, Plaintiff seeks to compel the production of certain documents withheld by Defendant in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. Stratus Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Donald A. JENSEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Dale Gehring v. Case CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Caouette v. OfficeMax, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
- Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Vázquez-Fernández v. Cambridge College, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Aponte-Navedo v. Nalco Chemical Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.