Legal Opinion
Onwuka v. Federal Express Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1997No. Civ. 4-96-516 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery. See Rule 37, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on August 7,1997, at which time the Plaintiff-appeared by Stephen Fiebiger, Esq., and the Defendants appeared by Richard Beens, Esq.
For reasons wliich follow, we grant the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, in part.
II.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Jan Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- James H. Sallis v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Aon Risk Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Prokosch v. Catalina Lighting, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Johnson v. Nissan North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.