Legal Opinion
Caouette v. OfficeMax, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided January 21, 2005No. CIV.03-251-JDPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DiCLERICO, District Judge.
Wilfred G. Caouette, proceeding pro se, and OfficeMax, Inc., have cross-moved for summary judgment on Caouette’s claim against the company for age discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (the “ADEA”). OfficeMax has also moved for summary judgment on Caouette’s claims for wrongful discharge, defamation, libel, and slander under New Hampshire law. Each side has objected to the other’s motion. 1 The court will treat Caouette’s request for other “relief’ in his motion as seeking to compel OfficeMax to answer…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- McDonald v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Sánchez-Medina v. Unicco Service Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Collins v. University of New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Ojo v. HC DOC, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.