Legal Opinion

Houlihan v. Corporation of St. Anthony in New Bedford

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided November 2, 1909No. 123PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action by Michael J. Houlihan against the Corporation of St. Anthony in New Bedford. On appeal from clerk’s.taxation of costs.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff brought an action of contract to recover the balance of the price alleged to he due for building a church. Before jury trial the following rule was entered:

“And now. to wit, February 12, HMKi, by agreement of parlies, it is ordered bv the court that Clarence II. Cooper. Esq., be, and he hereby is, appointed auditor in the above-named action, to hear the parties, stain the facts, and report the questions of law and fact relating thereto, which either party may request.”

The accounts were complicated, and the hearings numerous, extending over two years or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fenno v. PrimroseCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  2. Primrose v. FennoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
  2. United Waterworks Co. v. StoneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
  3. Northern Assur. Co. v. Del MoralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  4. The Walter AdamsDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API