Legal Opinion

Primrose v. Fenno

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided February 7, 1902No. 934PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff has requested us to revise the clerk’s taxation of costs. The questions relate to one-half of the auditor’s fee of $1,515, and the travel and attendance of witnesses who attended before him. The manner in which the auditor was appointed appears by the following extract from the record:

“Case opened by the plaintiff to the second jury. After hearing the opening of the case, neither party objecting, the court discharges the jury from the case, and appoints Frederick Dodge, Msg., auditor, with liberty to make alternative findings, and orders that attendance of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Handy v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
  3. Whipple v. Cumberland Cotton Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1844
  4. Jordan v. Agawam Woollen Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1869
  5. Nichols v. BrunswickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. United States v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S. S. M. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1916
  4. Scatcherd v. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
  5. Kell v. TrenchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API